ThinkX
ThinkX ThinkX Flow

Technical Profile 2026

Biomimetic Dentistry

Biobases and Biomimetic Structural Reinforcement

Research Institutions

UFAM - Biomaterials Group UNESP - São José dos Campos UFS - Campus Lagarto

Clinical Collaborations

Prof. Paulo Moriya Profa. Tininha Gomes Prof. Reinaldo Nascimento Prof. Tarcísio Zaranza Prof. Bruno Braga Prof. Italo Gianesini Prof. Pedro Corrêa Prof. Mairon Fernandes
1

Context and Scientific Foundation

1.1 Challenges of Modern Restorative Dentistry and Biomechanics

Contemporary restorative dentistry faces a critical challenge in the rehabilitation of teeth with significant structural loss. Although conventional particulate-filled composites (PFCs) have evolved in aesthetics and adhesion, their intrinsically brittle nature and low fracture toughness (KIC) severely limit clinical longevity in high-stress areas.

The natural tooth functions as a harmonious biomechanical system, where the rigid enamel is supported by resilient dentin. When this structure is disrupted by extensive caries or wide cavity preparations, the structural rigidity of the remaining tooth is drastically reduced, making the tooth susceptible to catastrophic failures.

Frequently, particulate restorations fail by allowing crack propagation that culminates in vertical root fractures, resulting in the irreversible loss of the dental element.

Catastrophic structural failure
Figure 1. Example of catastrophic structural failure in a tooth restored with conventional composite resin. The low fracture toughness (KIC) of particulate resins prevents crack arrest under cyclic masticatory loading. Image: Prof. Bruno Braga

1.2 The Science of Short Fiber Reinforcement (SFRCs)

To overcome the brittleness of conventional composites, the science of Short Fiber-Reinforced Composites (SFRCs) represents a radical shift in restorative materials engineering.

Instead of the polymer matrix absorbing masticatory stresses alone, which favors microcracks and adhesive failures, a load transfer occurs to a system of discontinuous glass fibers with superior elastic modulus, stiffness, and strength.

This is the structural principle that underpins ThinkX's performance: acting as a biobase, i.e., a functional dentin substitute, capable of absorbing energy, dissipating stresses, and protecting the adhesive interface against overloads.

Evidence shows that reinforcement efficiency depends on a high volume fraction combined with an aspect ratio (l/d) greater than 20 — exactly the parameters present in ThinkX resins, whose fibers have l/d≈25:1, forming a dense, multidirectional network.

3D fiber network
Figure 2. Micrograph showing the three-dimensional network of short E-glass fibers incorporated in the ThinkX resin matrix.

1.3 Toughening Mechanisms: Deflection, Bridging, and Pull-out

Just as in dentin, whose organic matrix is composed of collagen fibers forming a microarchitecture responsible for its ductility, intrinsic toughness, and stress-absorption capacity, ThinkX resins use a biomimetic fibrillar microstructure.

ThinkX's network of silanized glass fibers offers mechanics similar to dentin:

  • Increases fracture toughness
  • Provides an elastic modulus compatible with dentin (12–17 GPa)
  • Promotes energy dissipation through deflection, bridging, and pull-out
  • Protects the adhesive interface against concentrated stresses

This structural biomimetics is what makes ThinkX the best contemporary dentin substitute in the restorative context, especially in weakened teeth or those subjected to high functional loads.

SEM Crack propagation
Figure 3. SEM micrograph (400×) demonstrating the action of short glass fibers in ThinkX during crack propagation — bridging and pull-out mechanisms visible.
2

ThinkX and ThinkX Flow Ecosystem

2.1. Introduction to the Biomechanical Evolution of Reinforced Composites

The ThinkX ecosystem is not just a new line of materials, but a structural solution for the dilemmas of modern restorative dentistry. While conventional composites rely on a densely particle-loaded matrix to resist wear, ThinkX technology introduces a three-dimensional glass fiber network that transforms the resin into a "biostructural" material.

This biomimetic approach allows the clinician to replace lost dentin with a material that not only fills the volume but restores the resilience and toughness necessary to protect the remaining tooth structure against catastrophic fractures.

2.2. Product Description and Clinical Versatility

ThinkX Posterior

Figure 4a. ThinkX (Packable) - High Viscosity

ThinkX (Packable)

High Viscosity

A high-viscosity resin with 80-85% filler load (w/w) and reinforcement of 10-15% E-glass fibers.

Ideal for volumetric reconstructions where condensation and sculpting of dentin anatomy are needed. Functions as a "condensable dentin" for larger volume reconstructions.

ThinkX Flow

Figure 4b. ThinkX Flow - High Thixotropy

ThinkX Flow

High Thixotropy

A highly thixotropic flowable version, containing 70-75% filler and a higher fiber concentration (20-25%).

The flowability allows intimate contact with cavity walls, being excellent for biobases, deep margin elevation (DME), and filling hard-to-reach areas. Acts as a "flowable dentin".

2.3. Indications: From Cavity Base to Cusp Reconstruction

ThinkX and ThinkX Flow were formulated for situations where tooth survival depends on the material's ability to absorb and redistribute stresses:

Dentin replacement in deep and wide cavities (Class I and II)
Reconstruction of endodontically treated teeth
Reinforced biobases (core build-up) under semi-direct and indirect restorations
Deep margin elevation (DME)
Reinforcement of weakened walls and teeth with structural cracks
Internal "locking" of the dental structure

Differentiator: Unlike traditional bulk fills, which prioritize only depth of cure, ThinkX is a real mechanical reinforcement material, designed to be the long-lasting infrastructure beneath the final enamel layer.

3

Materials Engineering

Core Technologies

3.1

Chemical Composition and Optimized Monomer Matrix

The ThinkX line uses a matrix based on a balanced blend of Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA, optimized to ensure a high Degree of Conversion (DC).

This matrix allows ideal fiber wettability, ensuring that each glass filament is completely enveloped by the polymer, minimizing water sorption and hydrolytic degradation.

3.2

Fiber Architecture: Geometry, Fraction, and Aspect Ratio

The material uses silanized E-glass fibers with controlled geometry to maximize structural reinforcement.

Fiber Type Silanized E-glass
Length ~350 μm
Diameter ~14 μm
Aspect Ratio (l/d) >20 (≈25:1)
3.3

Fiber-Matrix Synergy: SEM Evidence

The integrity of the interface between the fiber and the resin matrix is the determining factor for the success of toughening mechanisms.

SEM analyses demonstrate a "clean" interface without gaps between the glass fiber and the resin matrix, proving the effectiveness of the surface treatment (Silanization).

Fiber-matrix interface SEM 4000x
Figure 5. Electron micrograph (4,000×) showing the ThinkX fiber-matrix interface. The absence of perimetral gaps confirms the effectiveness of silanization and the total synergy between the reinforcement and the polymer.
4

Physical Properties and Mechanical Performance

Validated by the UFAM Biomaterials Group and ICT-UNESP

4.1. Fracture Toughness (KIC): Resistance to Crack Propagation

Fracture toughness is considered the most critical property for fiber-reinforced composites, as it quantifies the material's ability to arrest crack growth under load.

While conventional resins suffer brittle and rapid fractures, the ThinkX line exhibits elite performance, surpassing the leading global competitors.

This result indicates that the material is extremely effective in transforming what would be a catastrophic failure into safe mechanical behavior, preserving the underlying dental structure.

KIC Chart
Chart 1. Fracture Toughness (KIC): Structural Superiority. Source: UFAM (2025)

4.2. Elastic Modulus and Poisson's Ratio: The Biomimetic Match

For a material to function as a dentin substitute, its stiffness and lateral deformation behavior must be similar to the natural tissue.

Elastic Modulus: Both materials are within the "Gold Range" of human dentin (12-20 GPa), with ThinkX Flow (12.54 GPa) and ThinkX (16.53 GPa).

Poisson's Ratio: The values of 0.23 and 0.28 are in harmony with the biological range of dentin (0.25-0.31).

This combination reduces the risk of interface fatigue and cusp deflection, consolidating ThinkX as a superior functional dentin substitute.

Elastic Modulus Chart
Chart 2. Biomechanical Synergy: Elastic Modulus and Poisson's Ratio. Source: ICT-UNESP and UFS-Lagarto

4.3. Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength

The great differentiator of ThinkX Flow is its homogeneity. The low variation in results (reduced standard deviation) translates into superior clinical reliability, ensuring predictable performance without internal weak points.

Compression/Tensile Chart
Chart 3. Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength. Source: UFAM (2025)

4.4. Flexural Strength and Modulus

Flexural strength is vital for restorations covering large areas or replacing cusps. The ThinkX line demonstrates an ideal balance between flexural strength and modulus, offering robustness and resilience.

Flexural Chart
Chart 4. Flexural Properties: Strength and Modulus. Source: UFAM (2025)
5

Clinical Safety and Diagnostics

5.1. Photoelasticity: Low Contraction Stress

The failure of many extensive restorations begins during polymerization. When the material contracts excessively, it "pulls" the tooth walls, generating microgaps, post-operative sensitivity, and even enamel cracks.

In photoelasticity studies conducted by Prof. Paulo Moriya, ThinkX demonstrated exemplary behavior.

The fiber network acts as an internal scaffold, "breaking" the continuity of the resin matrix contraction and protecting the integrity of weakened cavity walls.

Results Analysis:

  • By Technique: 2mm increments demonstrate consistent reduction in contraction energy
  • By Material: ThinkX Flow and ThinkX show lower-intensity isochromatic patterns
Photoelasticity
Figure 7. Residual stress mapping by photoelasticity. The ThinkX ecosystem demonstrates greater biomechanical compatibility, resulting in lower levels of residual stress. Source: Prof. Paulo Moriya

5.2. Depth of Cure (DOC)

The ThinkX line presents depth of cure greater than 5mm, exceeding the requirements of ISO 4049 standard and ensuring clinical safety in deep cavities.

Material DOC (ISO 4049)
ThinkX 5.11 mm
EverX 5.8 mm
ThinkX Flow 5.19 mm
EverX Flow 4.45 mm

Note: Maximum 2mm increments are recommended to control contraction stress.

5.3. Radiopacity

The ThinkX line presents superior radiopacity levels, exceeding the requirements of ISO 4049 standard and allowing precise visualization in radiographic examinations.

Material Radiopacity
ThinkX 230%
EverX 232.5%
ThinkX Flow 188%
EverX Flow 166%

Note: ISO 4049 requires minimum radiopacity of 100% (equivalent to 1mm of aluminum).

6

Handling and Aesthetic Attributes

Operational Intelligence: optimized rheological and optical properties

6.1

Thixotropy and Stability

ThinkX Flow utilizes advanced thixotropy: the material flows under pressure (during application) but stabilizes immediately after insertion. Allows filling complex cavities or performing DME without the material invading undesired areas.

6.2

Structural Opacity

The ThinkX line has a calibrated opacity to block chromatic interference from darkened backgrounds. Starting at 2mm, the material neutralizes the high-contrast background, and with 3-4mm we achieve complete masking.

6.3

Biomimetic Fluorescence

ThinkX incorporates fluorescent pigments that mimic the glow of human dentin under UV light. Ensures that the restoration does not "disappear" or present an artificially opaque appearance under different lighting conditions.

Thixotropy Test
Figure 8. Thixotropy test (5 minutes). ThinkX Flow maintains dimensional stability.
Opacity Comparison
Figure 9. Opacity comparison: ThinkX vs. ThinkX Flow.
Opacity
Figure 10. Structural opacity at different thicknesses.
Fluorescence
Figure 11. Biomimetic fluorescence under UV light. Source: Profa. Tininha Gomes and Prof. Reinaldo Nascimento
7

Step-by-Step Clinical Guide

Structural Reinforcement Protocol — Applicable to direct, semi-direct, and indirect restorations

1

Structural Preparation and Adhesive System

  • Structural Analysis: Identify the presence of dentin cracks, weakened cusps (<2mm), and areas requiring reinforcement
  • IDS & Resin Coating: Apply the adhesive system (compatible with any methacrylate-based system). Then perform the Resin Coating with a thin layer (0.5 to 1mm) of ThinkX Flow
2

Biobase Formation with ThinkX Flow

  • Intelligent Thixotropy: ThinkX Flow penetrates micro-irregularities, eliminating the risk of voids
  • Stress Management: Even with high DOC (>5mm), use 1-2mm increments to control contraction stress
  • DME: In subgingival margins, ThinkX Flow's stability allows precise margin elevation
3

Dentin Reconstruction with ThinkX (Packable)

  • Dentin Substitute: Insert in 1-2mm increments, sculpting the internal architecture and leaving 1.5 to 2mm of space for the final enamel
  • Deflection Reduction: The fiber network reduces cusp flexion under occlusal loading
4

Photoactivation and Biobase Protection

  • Enhanced Curing: Photoactivate each increment for 20 to 40 seconds (1000mW/cm²)
  • Enamel Coverage: Final coverage with particulate resin or ceramic piece is recommended, protecting the fibers and ensuring aesthetic longevity
8

Clinical Cases

Clinical Case 1 — Prof. Tarcísio Zaranza

Metal post removal and semi-direct restoration fabrication

Case 1
Figure 12. Sequence: 1) Initial case with rubber dam isolation. 2) Partial removal of infiltrated cast metal post. 3) Complete post removal. 4) Caries detector application. 5) Substrate cleaning and copper matrix installation. 6) Distal margin elevation. 7) ThinkX application. 8) Biobase completed. 9) Semi-direct restoration ready and cemented. 10) Completed case.
9

Bibliographic References

  1. UFAM Biomaterials and Biomimetics Group (2025). Comparative Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composites.
  2. Cruz BS, et al. (ICT-Unesp and UFS-Lagarto). Mechanical Characterization of ThinkX Flow and ThinkX.
  3. Moriya, P. Quasi-3D dynamic photoelastic analysis of stress distribution during polymerization.
  4. Lassila, L., et al. (2020). Characterization of restorative short-fiber reinforced dental composites. Journal of Dentistry.

UFAM

Biomaterials and Biomimetics Group

UNESP

ICT - São José dos Campos

UFS

Campus Lagarto

Version: 2026.1 | Date: February 12, 2026